View Single Post
Old 02-21-2015, 02:10 PM   #1
jacqueline1102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 183
Research for discussion

Greetings all,

The topic of whether to drink alcohol has come up a few times. Here is a link which you might find interesting. The industry will publish results based on it's own vested industry. There is alot of money to be made to keep the general public in the dark. I would post in its entirety but it is rather long. This is not meant to jump on a soap box as I certainly enjoy my wine. But it does leave one to go hmmm.... Once I started doing my own research in the past two years in regards to medicine, one cannot help but notice bias do occur based on who is funding the research. Is there really such a thing as complete objectivity?

Am J Public Health. 2013 February; 103(2): 206–214.
Published online 2013 February. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300847
PMCID: PMC3558773

Public Health, Academic Medicine, and the Alcohol Industry’s Corporate Social Responsibility Activities
Thomas F. Babor, PhD, MPHcorresponding author and Katherine Robaina, MPH
__________________
10/11 IBC Stage IV; 1 liver met 4.6 cm.
10/11-2/12 TCH for 6 rounds
3/12 Right MRM
5/12-7/12 33 Radiation treatments
8/1/12 Started Perjeta along with the Herceptin
10/12 Scans said NED for first time
5/15 UWSeattle Vaccine Trial 3 months
12/16 Scans still show NED. Herceptin and Perjeta continue indef.
8/17 Taken off Perjeta;staying on Herceptin. Still NEAD.
3/18 Still NEAD
8/19 Now on Subcutaneous Herceptin
10/21 Remain on Subcutaneous Herceptin (Hylecta)
11/21 CT showed possible lung mets. Was told to wait and see until scan
1/22 CT shows continued growth
03/22 Lung Biopsy said sample was too small but nodules keep growing and IR is convinced that it is indeed cancer
04/22 Oncologist referred for consult for a transbronchial biopsy. This does not sound pleasant
jacqueline1102 is offline   Reply With Quote