Thread: echo vs muga
View Single Post
Old 12-05-2006, 10:45 AM   #6
rinaina
Senior Member
 
rinaina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: northshore suburb of chicago
Posts: 1,093
Thanks Cathy and I agree with the muga's being a hassle. They take longer and why keep getting that radioactive junk injected into us, we have enough problems to deal with as it is. I did have to get an IV though for my echo in order for them to get good contrast but that was no big deal. Thanks for your input. I value the experience of the forum members.
__________________
~Rina~
Dx:3/06 had a lumpectomy April 19, 2006
Her2+ er/pr- Stage I Grade 3 tumor size 1.4 cm, node negative
AC 4 dense doses
34 radiation treatments including booster doses
receiving herceptin every 3 weeks since late August 2006 for 12 months
rinaina is offline   Reply With Quote