View Single Post
Old 04-22-2009, 06:39 PM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
Jean, and others who have asked me for an article on the relative merits of the diff-

rent AIs:

The Breast Journal
Volume 15 Issue 2, Pages 194 - 198
Published Online: 9 Mar 2009


SHORT COMMUNICATION
Enhancing the Adjuvant Treatment of Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
Mitchel Barry, MD, MRCSI and Malcolm R. Kell, MD, FRCSI
Breastcheck, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Malcolm R. Kell, MD, FRCSI, Breastcheck, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, University College Dublin, 36 Eccles St, Dublin, Ireland, or e-mail: malcolm.kell@breastcheck.ie
KEYWORDS
aromatase inhibitors • optimum adjuvant treatment • anastrozole • letrozole
ABSTRACT
Abstract: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now regarded as the optimum hormonal therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. However, it is unclear which of the currently available AIs offers patients the most effective and the best-tolerated treatment strategy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials that compared AIs (as first-line agents) with standard hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer. The results suggest that letrozole offers a more favorable side-effect profile particularly in terms of musculoskeletal adverse events. However, the available data suggests a small survival benefit from the use of anastrozole although patients treated with anastrozole appear to have a more favorable disease profile at study entry. Examination of survival data on adjuvant tamoxifen therapy from these trials supports this observation.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote