HER2 Support Group Forums - View Single Post

Rich66 · 05-13-2010, 11:11 PM

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;630:19-34.
Adaptation to estradiol deprivation causes up-regulation of growth factor pathways and hypersensitivity to estradiol in breast cancer cells.

Santen RJ, Song RX, Masamura S, Yue W, Fan P, Sogon T, Hayashi S, Nakachi K, Eguchi H.
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. rjs5y@virginia.edu

Abstract

Deprivation of estrogen causes breast tumors in women to adapt and develop enhanced sensitivity to this steroid. Accordingly, women relapsing after treatment with oophorectomy, which substantially lowers estradiol for a prolonged period, respond secondarily to aromatase inhibitors with tumor regression. We have utilized in vitro and in vivo model systems to examine the biologic processes whereby Long Term Estradiol Deprivation (LTED) causes cells to adapt and develop hypersensitivity to estradiol. Several mechanisms are associated with this response including up-regulation of ERalpha and the MAP kinase, PI-3-kinase and mTOR growth factor pathways. ERalpha is 4-10 fold up-regulated as a result of demethylation of its C promoter, This nuclear receptor then co-opts a classical growth factor pathway using SHC, Grb-2 and Sos. This induces rapid nongenomic effects which are enhanced in LTED cells. The molecules involved in the nongenomic signaling process have been identified. Estradiol binds to cell membrane-associated ERalpha which physically associates with the adaptor protein SHC and induces its phosphorylation. In turn, SHC binds Grb-2 and Sos which results in the rapid activation of MAP kinase. These nongenomic effects of estradiol produce biologic effects as evidenced by Elk-1 activation and by morphologic changes in cell membranes. Additional effects include activation of the PI-3-kinase and mTOR pathways through estradiol-induced binding of ERalpha to the IGF-1 and EGF receptors. A major question is how ERalpha locates in the plasma membrane since it does not contain an inherent membrane localization signal. We have provided evidence that the IGF-1 receptor serves as an anchor for ERalpha in the plasma membrane. Estradiol causes phosphorylation of the adaptor protein, SHC and the IGF-1 receptor itself. SHC, after binding to ERalpha, serves as the "glue" which tethers ERalpha to SHC binding sites on the activated IFG-1 receptors. Use of siRNA methodology to knock down SHC allows the conclusion that SHC is needed for ERalpha to localize in the plasma membrane. In order to abrogate growth factor induced hypersensitivity, we have utilized a drug, farnesylthiosalicylic acid, which blocks the binding of GTP-Ras to its membrane acceptor protein, galectin 1 and reduces the activation of MAP kinase. We have shown that this drug is a potent inhibitor of mTOR and this provides the major means for inhibition of cell proliferation. The concept of "adaptive hypersensitivity" and the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon have important clinical implications. The efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in patients relapsing on tamoxifen could be explained by this mechanism and inhibitors of growth factor pathways should reverse the hypersensitivity phenomenon and result in prolongation of the efficacy of hormonal therapy for breast cancer.

PMID: 18637482 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]PMCID: PMC2641021Free PMC Article

Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(6):R103. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
Anti-oestrogens but not oestrogen deprivation promote cellular invasion in intercellular adhesion-deficient breast cancer cells.

Borley AC, Hiscox S, Gee J, Smith C, Shaw V, Barrett-Lee P, Nicholson RI.
Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Road, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK.

FREE TEXT

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anti-oestrogens have been the mainstay of therapy in patients with oestrogen-receptor (ER) positive breast cancer and have provided significant improvements in survival. However, their benefits are limited by tumour recurrence in a significant proportion of initially drug-responsive breast cancer patients because of acquired anti-oestrogen resistance. Relapse on such therapies clinically presents as local and/or regional recurrences, frequently with distant metastases, and the prognosis for these patients is poor. The selective ER modulator, tamoxifen, classically exerts gene inhibitory effects during the drug-responsive phase in ER-positive breast cancer cells. Paradoxically, this drug is also able to induce the expression of genes, which in the appropriate cell context may contribute to an adverse cell phenotype. Here we have investigated the effects of tamoxifen and fulvestrant treatment on invasive signalling and compared this with the direct effects of oestrogen withdrawal to mimic the action of aromatase inhibitors. METHODS: The effect of oestrogen and 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen on the invasive capacity of endocrine-sensitive MCF-7 cells, in the presence or absence of functional E-cadherin, was determined by Matrigel invasion assays. Studies also monitored the impact of oestrogen withdrawal or treatment with fulvestrant on cell invasion. Western blotting using phospho-specific antibodies was performed to ascertain changes in invasive signalling in response to the two anti-oestrogens versus both oestradiol treatment and withdrawal. RESULTS: To the best of our knowledge, we report for the first time that tamoxifen can promote an invasive phenotype in ER-positive breast cancer cells under conditions of poor cell-cell contact and suggest a role for Src kinase and associated pro-invasive genes in this process. Our studies revealed that although this adverse effect is also apparent for further classes of anti-oestrogens, exemplified by the steroidal agent fulvestrant, it is absent during oestrogen withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight a previously unreported effect of tamoxifen (and potentially further anti-oestrogens), that such agents appear able to induce breast cancer cell invasion in a specific context (absence of good cell-cell contacts), where these findings may have major clinical implications for those patients with tumours that have inherently poor intercellular adhesion. In such patients oestrogen deprivation with aromatase inhibitors may be more appropriate.

PMID: 19055788 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]PMCID: PMC2656899Free PMC Article

Eur J Cancer. 2010 May 13. [Epub ahead of print]
Combining Src inhibitors and aromatase inhibitors: A novel strategy for overcoming endocrine resistance and bone loss.

Hiscox S, Barrett-Lee P, Borley AC, Nicholson RI.
Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract

Aromatase inhibitors have largely replaced tamoxifen as the first-line treatment for postmenopausal women with metastatic, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. However, many patients develop clinical resistance with prolonged treatment, and oestrogen deprivation following aromatase inhibition can result in loss of bone mineral density. Furthermore, most patients with metastatic breast cancer develop bone metastases, and the resulting adverse skeletal-related events are a significant cause of patient morbidity. Src, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase, is a component of signalling pathways that regulate breast cancer cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis as well as osteoclast-mediated bone turnover. Preclinical evidence also suggests a role for Src in acquired endocrine resistance. As such, Src inhibition represents a logical strategy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In vitro, combination therapy with Src inhibitors and endocrine agents, including aromatase inhibitors, has been shown to inhibit the proliferation and metastasis of both endocrine-responsive and endocrine-resistant breast cancer cell lines more effectively than either of the therapy alone. Src inhibition has also been shown to suppress osteoclast formation and activity. Combination therapy with aromatase inhibitors and Src inhibitors therefore represents a novel approach through which the development of both acquired resistance and bone pathology could be delayed. Data from clinical trials utilising such combinations will reveal if this strategy has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PMID: 20471823 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Coffee (reg& decaf) estrogenic:

http://her2support.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=41871&highlight=coffee+es trogen

J Nutr. 2009 Oct;139(10):1833-8. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
Trigonelline is a novel phytoestrogen in coffee beans.

Allred KF, Yackley KM, Vanamala J, Allred CD.
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Drinking coffee has been associated with the development of several endocrine-related cancers. The interpretation of these data has often been limited to the role that caffeine plays. Trigonelline (Trig), a niacin-related compound, is a natural constituent of coffee accounting for approximately 1% dry matter in roasted beans. Studies exploring the effects of this bioactive compound on mammalian cells are limited. The initial purpose of our studies was to determine whether Trig alters the actions of estradiol (E(2)), using proliferation of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells as a model system. When cells were cotreated with suboptimal doses of E(2) (10 pmol/L) and Trig (100 pmol/L), an additive enhancement of MCF-7 growth was observed. In the absence of E(2), Trig stimulated MCF-7 cell proliferation in a dose-responsive manner and significantly enhanced cell growth at concentrations as low as 100 pmol/L. Cotreatment of MCF-7 cells with Trig and ICI 182,780, an estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist, inhibited Trig-induced cell proliferation. Trig treatment also induced activation of estrogen response element reporter assays in MCF-7 cells and increased expression of ER target genes (pS2, progesterone receptor, and cyclin D1) similar to E(2). While our data demonstrate that Trig activates the ER, competitive binding assays showed that Trig does not compete E(2) off of the ER at any concentration. This suggests that Trig is activating the ER through a separate mechanism. Collectively, these data demonstrate that Trig even at low concentrations stimulates MCF-7 cell growth and that this effect is mediated through ER, clearly identifying Trig as a novel phytoestrogen.

05-13-2010, 11:11 PM	#5
Rich66 Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: South East Wisconsin Posts: 3,431	Re: ER+ issues Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;630:19-34. Adaptation to estradiol deprivation causes up-regulation of growth factor pathways and hypersensitivity to estradiol in breast cancer cells. Santen RJ, Song RX, Masamura S, Yue W, Fan P, Sogon T, Hayashi S, Nakachi K, Eguchi H. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. rjs5y@virginia.edu Abstract Deprivation of estrogen causes breast tumors in women to adapt and develop enhanced sensitivity to this steroid. Accordingly, women relapsing after treatment with oophorectomy, which substantially lowers estradiol for a prolonged period, respond secondarily to aromatase inhibitors with tumor regression. We have utilized in vitro and in vivo model systems to examine the biologic processes whereby Long Term Estradiol Deprivation (LTED) causes cells to adapt and develop hypersensitivity to estradiol. Several mechanisms are associated with this response including up-regulation of ERalpha and the MAP kinase, PI-3-kinase and mTOR growth factor pathways. ERalpha is 4-10 fold up-regulated as a result of demethylation of its C promoter, This nuclear receptor then co-opts a classical growth factor pathway using SHC, Grb-2 and Sos. This induces rapid nongenomic effects which are enhanced in LTED cells. The molecules involved in the nongenomic signaling process have been identified. Estradiol binds to cell membrane-associated ERalpha which physically associates with the adaptor protein SHC and induces its phosphorylation. In turn, SHC binds Grb-2 and Sos which results in the rapid activation of MAP kinase. These nongenomic effects of estradiol produce biologic effects as evidenced by Elk-1 activation and by morphologic changes in cell membranes. Additional effects include activation of the PI-3-kinase and mTOR pathways through estradiol-induced binding of ERalpha to the IGF-1 and EGF receptors. A major question is how ERalpha locates in the plasma membrane since it does not contain an inherent membrane localization signal. We have provided evidence that the IGF-1 receptor serves as an anchor for ERalpha in the plasma membrane. Estradiol causes phosphorylation of the adaptor protein, SHC and the IGF-1 receptor itself. SHC, after binding to ERalpha, serves as the "glue" which tethers ERalpha to SHC binding sites on the activated IFG-1 receptors. Use of siRNA methodology to knock down SHC allows the conclusion that SHC is needed for ERalpha to localize in the plasma membrane. In order to abrogate growth factor induced hypersensitivity, we have utilized a drug, farnesylthiosalicylic acid, which blocks the binding of GTP-Ras to its membrane acceptor protein, galectin 1 and reduces the activation of MAP kinase. We have shown that this drug is a potent inhibitor of mTOR and this provides the major means for inhibition of cell proliferation. The concept of "adaptive hypersensitivity" and the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon have important clinical implications. The efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in patients relapsing on tamoxifen could be explained by this mechanism and inhibitors of growth factor pathways should reverse the hypersensitivity phenomenon and result in prolongation of the efficacy of hormonal therapy for breast cancer. PMID: 18637482 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]PMCID: PMC2641021Free PMC Article Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(6):R103. Epub 2008 Dec 4. Anti-oestrogens but not oestrogen deprivation promote cellular invasion in intercellular adhesion-deficient breast cancer cells. Borley AC, Hiscox S, Gee J, Smith C, Shaw V, Barrett-Lee P, Nicholson RI. Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Road, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK. FREE TEXT Abstract INTRODUCTION: Anti-oestrogens have been the mainstay of therapy in patients with oestrogen-receptor (ER) positive breast cancer and have provided significant improvements in survival. However, their benefits are limited by tumour recurrence in a significant proportion of initially drug-responsive breast cancer patients because of acquired anti-oestrogen resistance. Relapse on such therapies clinically presents as local and/or regional recurrences, frequently with distant metastases, and the prognosis for these patients is poor. The selective ER modulator, tamoxifen, classically exerts gene inhibitory effects during the drug-responsive phase in ER-positive breast cancer cells. Paradoxically, this drug is also able to induce the expression of genes, which in the appropriate cell context may contribute to an adverse cell phenotype. Here we have investigated the effects of tamoxifen and fulvestrant treatment on invasive signalling and compared this with the direct effects of oestrogen withdrawal to mimic the action of aromatase inhibitors. METHODS: The effect of oestrogen and 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen on the invasive capacity of endocrine-sensitive MCF-7 cells, in the presence or absence of functional E-cadherin, was determined by Matrigel invasion assays. Studies also monitored the impact of oestrogen withdrawal or treatment with fulvestrant on cell invasion. Western blotting using phospho-specific antibodies was performed to ascertain changes in invasive signalling in response to the two anti-oestrogens versus both oestradiol treatment and withdrawal. RESULTS: To the best of our knowledge, we report for the first time that tamoxifen can promote an invasive phenotype in ER-positive breast cancer cells under conditions of poor cell-cell contact and suggest a role for Src kinase and associated pro-invasive genes in this process. Our studies revealed that although this adverse effect is also apparent for further classes of anti-oestrogens, exemplified by the steroidal agent fulvestrant, it is absent during oestrogen withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight a previously unreported effect of tamoxifen (and potentially further anti-oestrogens), that such agents appear able to induce breast cancer cell invasion in a specific context (absence of good cell-cell contacts), where these findings may have major clinical implications for those patients with tumours that have inherently poor intercellular adhesion. In such patients oestrogen deprivation with aromatase inhibitors may be more appropriate. PMID: 19055788 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]PMCID: PMC2656899Free PMC Article Eur J Cancer. 2010 May 13. [Epub ahead of print] Combining Src inhibitors and aromatase inhibitors: A novel strategy for overcoming endocrine resistance and bone loss. Hiscox S, Barrett-Lee P, Borley AC, Nicholson RI. Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff, UK. Abstract Aromatase inhibitors have largely replaced tamoxifen as the first-line treatment for postmenopausal women with metastatic, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. However, many patients develop clinical resistance with prolonged treatment, and oestrogen deprivation following aromatase inhibition can result in loss of bone mineral density. Furthermore, most patients with metastatic breast cancer develop bone metastases, and the resulting adverse skeletal-related events are a significant cause of patient morbidity. Src, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase, is a component of signalling pathways that regulate breast cancer cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis as well as osteoclast-mediated bone turnover. Preclinical evidence also suggests a role for Src in acquired endocrine resistance. As such, Src inhibition represents a logical strategy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In vitro, combination therapy with Src inhibitors and endocrine agents, including aromatase inhibitors, has been shown to inhibit the proliferation and metastasis of both endocrine-responsive and endocrine-resistant breast cancer cell lines more effectively than either of the therapy alone. Src inhibition has also been shown to suppress osteoclast formation and activity. Combination therapy with aromatase inhibitors and Src inhibitors therefore represents a novel approach through which the development of both acquired resistance and bone pathology could be delayed. Data from clinical trials utilising such combinations will reveal if this strategy has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. PMID: 20471823 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] Coffee (reg& decaf) estrogenic: http://her2support.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=41871&highlight=coffee+es trogen J Nutr. 2009 Oct;139(10):1833-8. Epub 2009 Aug 26. Trigonelline is a novel phytoestrogen in coffee beans. Allred KF, Yackley KM, Vanamala J, Allred CD. Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Drinking coffee has been associated with the development of several endocrine-related cancers. The interpretation of these data has often been limited to the role that caffeine plays. Trigonelline (Trig), a niacin-related compound, is a natural constituent of coffee accounting for approximately 1% dry matter in roasted beans. Studies exploring the effects of this bioactive compound on mammalian cells are limited. The initial purpose of our studies was to determine whether Trig alters the actions of estradiol (E(2)), using proliferation of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells as a model system. When cells were cotreated with suboptimal doses of E(2) (10 pmol/L) and Trig (100 pmol/L), an additive enhancement of MCF-7 growth was observed. In the absence of E(2), Trig stimulated MCF-7 cell proliferation in a dose-responsive manner and significantly enhanced cell growth at concentrations as low as 100 pmol/L. Cotreatment of MCF-7 cells with Trig and ICI 182,780, an estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist, inhibited Trig-induced cell proliferation. Trig treatment also induced activation of estrogen response element reporter assays in MCF-7 cells and increased expression of ER target genes (pS2, progesterone receptor, and cyclin D1) similar to E(2). While our data demonstrate that Trig activates the ER, competitive binding assays showed that Trig does not compete E(2) off of the ER at any concentration. This suggests that Trig is activating the ER through a separate mechanism. Collectively, these data demonstrate that Trig even at low concentrations stimulates MCF-7 cell growth and that this effect is mediated through ER, clearly identifying Trig as a novel phytoestrogen. __________________ Mom's treatment history (link)