|
RobinP, something I have wondered for quite a while is how accurate some of the nodal classifications are that go back before "breadloafing" and IHC staining of the nodes became common (which I guess is when Sentinel Node biopsies became standard care). Makes me think that there were more than a few "node positives" lumped in with the "node negative" stats. Maybe true node negatives have a better recurrence rate? Who knows, just call me . . . . .
Hopeful
|