View Single Post
Old 01-26-2012, 03:09 PM   #7
AlaskaAngel
Senior Member
 
AlaskaAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,018
Question Re: New Book Questions Mammography

Mine happened to be found by mammogram.

But "outside the box" thinking made me realize also that we sort of have a linear tendency when we have a local "recurrence" or second tumor locally, to just assume it had nothing to do with our repeated rads exposures. It makes me wonder why no one ever mentions that possibility in terms of analyzing the pro's and con's of mammography.

A.A.
__________________
Dx 2002 age 51
bc for granny, aunt, cousin, sister, mother.
ER+/PR+/HER2+++, grade 3
IDC 1.9 cm, some DCIS, Stage 1, Grade 3
Lumpectomy, CAFx6 (no blood boosters), IMRT rads, 1 3/4 yr tamoxifen
Rads necrosis
BRCA 1 & 2 negative
Trials: Early detection OVCA; 2004 low-dose testosterone for bc survivors
Diet: Primarily vegetarian organic; metformin (no diabetes), vitamin D3
Exercise: 7 days a week, 1 hr/day
No trastuzumab, no taxane, no AI
NED
AlaskaAngel is offline   Reply With Quote