View Single Post
Old 06-21-2008, 07:30 PM   #8
Janelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brentwood, CA
Posts: 76
Krista & Susan,
Thank you also for your replies. Frankly, if I were highly triple positve I would not have so much concern with only taking tamoxifen as hormonal therapy. I am primarily concerned that tamoxifen may be useless for me due to my negative PR status.

I need to update my signature to indicate that I am apparently now a "double positive"....but I'm not doing that until my path is re-reviewed by an outside institution.

Krista- one more thing...I don't love tamox either but it is better than chemopause for me. In a perfect world I would love for someone to tell us that hormonal therapy of any sort is useless and we can quit taking all these drugs. Not fun.

Cheers! (I'll have a glasss of red wine now and chill).

Janelle
__________________
Janelle
Diagnosed October 2006 at age 37 wtih grade 3 IDC and high grade DCIS
Stage 1c triple positive, no node involvement but
vascular invasion
multifocal disease
Lumpectomy November, 2006
A/C every 3 weeks (started Jan., 2007 and finished March 2007); followed weekly Taxol (finished June 2007) concurrent with Herceptin (finished March 2008);
Bilateral Mast with immediate recon in Sept 2007; finished recon Dec. 2007
Started 5 years of tamoxifen Nov. 2007; started peptide vaccine clinical trial at MD Anderson October 2008 and finished active part of trial in April 2009 (monthly injections of AE37 peptitde (HLA type specific) with GM-CSF or GM-CSF alone depending on if I was in experimental or control group); started Zometa infusions June 25, 2009- 4mg every 6 months for 3 years (taking it "off-label" to try to prevent mets)
Janelle is offline   Reply With Quote