|
I was disappointed that they, like so many STILL try to
lump all breast cancers together in order to reach out (very very far) to try to find these supposedly significant correlations.
How about looking only at studies of triple negatives, her2+s or even her2+er+s vs her2+ser-s, premenopausal vs postmenopausal, ibc vs ...
Statistical (more than far) reaching aside, its like asking if all human beings who live to age 2 also live to age 10. The difference is vastly different between those in areas of Africa where starvation and infectious disease are rampant vs Scandinavia vs Eskimos in the arctic.
How about comparing apples with apples?
|