View Single Post
Old 05-24-2009, 09:59 PM   #2
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
thought: There was a study in Britain showing sequencing Zoledronate 24 hrs after doxorubicin had profound anti-cancer effects. Could it be that Dox was somehow redirecting Zol away from bone and to cancer cells?



Int J Cancer. 2010 Jan 15;126(2):522-32.
Sustained inhibition of tumor growth and prolonged survival following sequential administration of doxorubicin and zoledronic acid in a breast cancer model.

Ottewell PD, Lefley DV, Cross SS, Evans CA, Coleman RE, Holen I.
University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Combination therapy, using agents that target the microenvironment as well as the cancer cells, is common in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Here, we show that a 6-week course of weekly sequential administration of the cytotoxic drug doxorubicin (2 mg/kg), followed 24 hr later by the antiresorptive agent zoledronic acid (100 microg/kg), causes substantial inhibition of subcutaneous MDA-MB-436 breast tumor growth in immunocompromised mice, leading to significantly increased survival. Tumor growth did not resume following withdrawal of treatment after 6 weeks, with 60% of the animals in this group surviving for more than 160 days. In comparison, animals receiving single-agent therapy all died within 50 days. Molecular analysis of the tumors showed no effect on cell cycle or apoptosis following administration of 100 microg/kg zoledronic acid or 2 mg/kg doxorubicin alone. When doxorubicin was administered 24 hr before zoledronic acid, tumors displayed decreased expression of CYCLINS E1, B, D1 and D3 as well as CDK2, CDC2, CDK4 and CDK7, indicative of cell-cycle inhibition. Tumors from animals receiving sequential treatment also showed induction of both intrinsic- and extrinsic-apoptotic pathways, with increased expression of BAX, decreased expression of BCL-2 and activation of CASPASE 3, 8 and 9. Accumulation of the unprenylated form of RAP1a, a surrogate marker for uptake of zoledronic acid, was only detected in tumors from animals treated with doxorubicin 24 hr before zoledronic acid. Our data are the first to show a sustained antitumor effect in vivo following a limited course of sequential administration of doxorubicin followed by zoledronic acid.

PMID: 19621384 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]




Mol Cancer Ther. 2009 Oct;8(10):2821-32. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
Anticancer mechanisms of doxorubicin and zoledronic acid in breast cancer tumor growth in bone.

Ottewell PD, Woodward JK, Lefley DV, Evans CA, Coleman RE, Holen I.
Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, United Kingdom.
Patients with advanced breast cancer frequently develop bone metastases, and at this stage, the disease is considered incurable. Here, we show that a 6-week course of weekly administration of doxorubicin (2 mg/kg), followed 24 hours later by the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (100microg/kg), causes substantial inhibition of MDA-MB-436 breast tumor burden in bone of immunocompromised mice, compared with administration of the single agents. Molecular analysis of tumors from animals treated sequentially with doxorubicin followed by zoledronic acid showed reduced numbers of proliferating tumor cells and decreased expression of cyclins E1, B, D1, and D3 as well as cdk2 and cdk4. Tumors from the sequential treatment group also displayed increased levels of apoptosis, increased expression of bcl2-associated X protein, decreased expression of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma 2, and activation of caspase 3, 8, and 9. Zoledronic acid caused a small reduction in tumor volume, reduced tumor cell proliferation, and decreased expression of cyclins D1 and D3, compared with tumors from animals treated with saline or doxorubicin. Doxorubicin had no effect on tumor growth, cell cycle, or apoptosis in vivo, but did cause increased accumulation of a bisphosphonate in MDA-MB-436 cells in vitro, suggesting that doxorubicin may affect subsequent uptake of zoledronic acid. In support of this, accumulation of unprenylated Rap1A, a surrogate marker of zoledronic acid, was only detected in tumors following sequential treatment, and not following treatment with zoledronic acid alone. Our data are the first to show the specific molecular pathways by which sequential treatment with doxorubicin and zoledronic acid induce tumor cell apoptosis and inhibit proliferation in an in vivo model of breast tumor growth in bone.

PMID: 19789217 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]





1: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 20;100(16):1167-78. Epub 2008 Aug 11. Links

Antitumor effects of doxorubicin followed by zoledronic acid in a mouse model of breast cancer.

Ottewell PD, Mönkkönen H, Jones M, Lefley DV, Coleman RE, Holen I.
Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK. i.holen@sheffield.ac.uk.
BACKGROUND: The potent antiresorptive drug zoledronic acid (Zol) enhances the antitumor effects of chemotherapy agents in vitro. We investigated the effects of clinically achievable doses of doxorubicin (Dox) and Zol, given alone, in sequence, and in combination, on the growth of established breast tumors in vivo. METHODS: Female MF1 nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 5 x 10(5) human breast cancer MDA-MB-436 cells that stably expressed green fluorescent protein (ie, MDA-G8 cells). Beginning on day 7 after tumor cell injection, the mice were injected weekly for 6 weeks with saline, Dox (2 mg/kg body weight via intravenous injection), Zol (100 microg/kg body weight via intraperitoneal injection), Dox plus Zol, Zol followed 24 hours later by Dox, or Dox followed 24 hours later by Zol (n = 8-9 mice per group). The effects of treatment on tumor growth were determined by measuring tumor volume; on tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation by immunohistochemistry using antibodies for caspase-3 and Ki-67, respectively; and on bone by microcomputed tomography and bone histomorphometry. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Treatment with Dox or Zol alone or Zol followed 24 hours later by Dox did not statistically significantly decrease final tumor volume compared with saline. Mice treated with Dox plus Zol had statistically significantly smaller final tumor volumes than those treated with Dox alone (mean = 122 mm(3) vs 328 mm(3), difference = 206 mm(3), 95% confidence interval [CI] = 78 to 335 mm(3), P < .001), with Zol alone (122 mm(3) vs 447 mm(3), difference = 325 mm(3), 95% CI = 197 to 454 mm(3), P < .001), or with Zol followed 24 hours later by Dox (122 mm(3) vs 418 mm(3), difference = 296 mm(3), 95% CI = 168 to 426 mm(3), P < .001). Treatment with Dox followed 24 hours later by Zol almost completely abolished tumor growth. Tumors from mice that were treated with Dox followed by Zol had more caspase-3-positive cells than tumors from mice treated with saline (mean number of caspase-3-positive cells per square millimeter: 605.0 vs 82.19, difference = 522.8, 95% CI = 488.2 to 557.4, P < .001), with Zol alone (605.0 vs 98.44, difference = 506.6, 95% CI = 472.0 to 541.2, P < .001), or with Zol followed by Dox (605.0 vs 103.1, difference = 501.9, 95% CI = 467.3 to 536.5, P < .001). The treatment-induced increase in the number of caspase-3-positive cells was mirrored by a decrease in the number of tumor cells positive for the proliferation marker Ki-67. No evidence of bone disease was detected in any of the treatment groups following microcomputed tomography and histological analysis of bone. CONCLUSION: Sequential treatment with Dox followed by Zol elicited substantial antitumor effects in subcutaneous breast tumors in vivo, in the absence of bone disease.
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote