View Single Post
Old 12-03-2010, 08:11 AM   #1
Margerie
Senior Member
 
Margerie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 492
The Aftermath of 2009 Mammogram Guidelines

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/12/03...ex.html?hpt=T2

As a sidenote: I was dx at 38. My sister, a year younger, has been getting mammograms since she was 38. She is now 42 and recently had her mammogram. SHe got a call back because she had " a cluster of calcifications that has increased in size" since her last digital mammo.

1. They did not tell her about the cluster at her last mammo a year ago.

2. Clustered calcifications are highly suspicious for cancer.

3, She has a sister that had breast cancer diagnosed young, and a mother with ovarian cancer. (I tested negative for BRCA 1 and 2)

4. If she did indeed have clustered calcs last year, the protocol should have been SHORT term mammo followup and/or a biopsy.

5. I am not happy about the lack of care and the lack of information.

Will find out more today at her call back for additional views......... I bet they use the "we didn't want you to worry" (i.e. become hysterical) argument. She is very pro-active with her health, but is completely helpless with no information.
__________________
Are we there yet?


Dx 10/05 IDC, multi-focal, triple +, 5 nodes+
MRM, 4 DD A/C, 12 weekly taxol + herceptin
rads concurrent with taxol/herceptin
finished herceptin 01/08
ooph, Arimidex, bilateral DIEP reconstruction
NED
Univ. of WA, Seattle vaccine trial '07

Last edited by Margerie; 12-03-2010 at 08:16 AM..
Margerie is offline   Reply With Quote