Missy,
I'm sorry to hear about your subborn liver met.
Why did the doctors tell you that you're not a candidate for radiofrequency ablation?
I had RFA of a tumor in my lung, which is done much, much less frequently than for the liver.
Many times, oncs rule out alternative procedures because the cancer is advanced and not a primary cancer of the lung or liver. That is, they don't like to do these procedures on metastses. They also don't consider them standard of treatment for metastatic bc.
The idea of an RFA for one met in the liver is that the procedure may eradicate the met without you're having to undergo a liver resection. This might well be the case too if it's the same met that went away before, meaning that no others have formed in the meantime.
Generally, a nodule should not be over 3.5 cm.
Many oncs dismiss local procedures in favor of only systemic procedures. Every onc I consulted was against the RFA of the lung. Or they tell you RFAs are reserved for people who are surgically inoperable.
I had the RFA last August and a CT scan last Saturday showed no nodules.
Also, a year prior to having the RFA I had the nodule removed with a wedge resection of the lung, and one year later it recurred, which is why I did the RFA (that is, it wasn't a new nodule, it was a recurrence of the old nodule even though I had clean margins).
Perhaps you can consult a radiation interventionist which is the kind of doctor who does this procedure.
Here are two links:
Radiological society of North American
http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?PG=rfa
University of Southern California
http://www.surgery.usc.edu/divisions...yablation.html
Joan