View Single Post
Old 03-13-2009, 10:40 AM   #5
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
It is also interesting as there are waning results as time goes on 51% to 36% to 25%.

Perhaps Jean is right in thinking that we should get tuned up with some Herceptin on a quarterly basis (or something like that). For example, highly hormone positive women who take Taxoxifen tended to recur about 2 years post Tamoxifen therapy but now those women would then take 5 yrs of Femara (or take any anti hormonal longer). Perhaps Herceptin is kind of like "tamoxifen" for Her2+ and that something should continue to be taken for a longer period of time? Who knows? The 2 yr results will be interesting in dealing with part of the "over time" question as these women will have gotten Herceptin for a longer period. Perhaps the initial results aren't any better for 1 vs 2 yrs but maybe there will be a difference in the 4 yr or 6 yr results of 1 vs 2 yrs.

I guess we will just have to wait and see.
__________________
Kind regards

Becky

Found lump via BSE
Diagnosed 8/04 at age 45
1.9cm tumor, ER+PR-, Her2 3+(rt side)
2 micromets to sentinel node
Stage 2A
left 3mm DCIS - low grade ER+PR+Her2 neg
lumpectomies 9/7/04
4DD AC followed by 4 DD taxol
Used Leukine instead of Neulasta
35 rads on right side only
4/05 started Tamoxifen
Started Herceptin 4 months after last Taxol due to
trial results and 2005 ASCO meeting & recommendations
Oophorectomy 8/05
Started Arimidex 9/05
Finished Herceptin (16 months) 9/06
Arimidex Only
Prolia every 6 months for osteopenia

NED 18 years!

Said Christopher Robin to Pooh: "You must remember this: You're braver than you believe and stronger than you seem and smarter than you think"
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote